Unofficial:Tatasky to increase frequency capacity to 16
Advertisement

Unofficial:Tatasky to increase frequency capacity to 16
#1
This is some information got from tatasky official today that they are going to increase the frequency capacity to 16 from the present 12 after making few adjustments.. and thereby will increase the channel capacity by January end.HD channels will also increase along with normal channels.
So New Year will be beginning well for tatasky if it happens Smile
#2
But how Mj? from any nearby satellite?!
#3
Now even tatasky officials also spreading rumours?
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to ravi for this post:
  • kgf110077
#4
(Sunday 25-December-2011, 06:53)Viki Wrote: But how Mj? from any nearby satellite?!


No, i think it might be from same satellite.. we can only monitor what developments they will be doing.. then get some idea..
#5
very good news,tatasky never let its subscribers down and will be doing anything to make them happy.And they have yet again proved it that they are the best
#6
(Sunday 25-December-2011, 06:53)Viki Wrote: But how Mj? from any nearby satellite?!
Tatasky is spreading rumors with its officals I think. Till now they are busy spamming in the internet.
#7
(Sunday 25-December-2011, 13:21)MJ786 Wrote:
(Sunday 25-December-2011, 06:53)Viki Wrote: But how Mj? from any nearby satellite?!


No, i think it might be from same satellite.. we can only monitor what developments they will be doing.. then get some idea..
Oh! But I think Insat 4A has no extra Ku band TP. It is having only 12 C Band TP and 12 Ku Band TP. Which are already in use.
#8
Yes Amatan, you are absolutely right. They are spreading rumor, how is it possible to add 4 new TP's in Insat 4A itself.
[-] The following 2 users say Thank You to kumaran for this post:
  • gapa, s.raman
#9
SAD to see here amatan is in doubt about MJs news Huh
#10
I dont think he is in doubt about my news.. but instead doubting about tatasky
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to MJ786 for this post:
  • gapa


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: